Update: Just wanted to say, these aren’t like the tenets of blogging I live by or something like that, they’re just what I could think of upon sitting down to think about it.
I write because I have things to say. Probably I think these things are not immediately obvious or thought about by everyone. Or perhaps some things are merely simple reminders or a fresh view on something.
I write publicly to share. To share my thoughts, to provoke contemplation and discussion.1
I write to practice. One can often become discouraged comparing themselves to those they admire (for me, famous bloggers who write well like John Gruber, Anil Dash, etc. Not that I’m particularly a fan of those two, but it’s a culture and medium I like). But of course, one only becomes better at an art by doing it, and so I am here.
I write because I think what I write is worth reading. I don’t write copy. I write content (or try). No content = no post (with minor exceptions). Even if I do just “come up” with posts instead of them coming to me.
Why a blog? It’s linear. It’s a story. It’s a continuous outlet. Unlike some other types of publications, there is one thing it’s not, though: predictably published, something I like. It may have a pace, a predictable rhythm of sorts, but not a schedule per se. It’s a bit more freeflow that way.
I write because I want people to read what I write. I want them to laugh or think or be sad. I want them to be affected. Isn’t that why everybody writes, to affect? Even if it’s a textbook, the idea is to change by adding knowledge and know-how. What are blog comments then? Responses. And (see the footnote), if I disable comments, people who really feel strongly about what I have written might take up the pen themselves. It’s about effect, or at least it should be, more than comments or page views. If it has no effect, what is its worth?
And thus I want some readers, because that means people who keep coming back to hear what I say, and thus can be affected. Therefore, I should be worth it. Like I said before, no content, no post.
- That being said, the idea of turning off comments is rolling around in my head. ↩
April 16th, 2010 at 4:06 pm
Nat, Loved your post today. You made me a subscriber. Affect vs effect. So few people get it. I like the way you think. Looking forward to getting to know you better on the Salem trip.
Blessings.
April 16th, 2010 at 9:00 pm
Thank you. Sorry if it’s obvious and I’m just missing something, but I didn’t quite get the bit about affect vs. effect. What made you say that?
April 17th, 2010 at 8:03 am
For what it’s worth, I’ve been blogging for the past 11 years for pretty much just the reasons you’ve described.
April 17th, 2010 at 11:17 am
I guess I might be on the right track then. Thanks for the comment, Anil.
April 25th, 2010 at 10:20 pm
I’m guessing the affect vs. effect comment was because so many people have no idea which is which and are always spelling one or the other wrong. You used them 5 times in your post and each time correctly. If you didn’t even realize you were doing it, well. That is even more amazing.