- With the funding environment turning, VCs are firmly in the driver's seat. And nowhere is this more obvious than the term sheets they are setting
- There is a heightened focus on information rights, inspections, thresholds for reserved matters, monitoring related party transaction, board constitution, anti-dilution provisions and reporting
- They also include the right to consult senior management (other than founders) and conduct inspections or special audits
- These clauses are sparking deeper discussions and setting clear expectations after investment rounds
Enter your email address to receive a daily summary of all our stories.
Startup founders quickly learn not to take anything for granted. Least of all, their equity. Especially because, from idea to exit, it’s a wild ride with see-sawing power plays between them and their investors.
Venture capitalists (VCs), haunted by mistakes over the last four years, are rewriting the rules. One term sheet and one clause at a time.
If Ashneer Grover of Bharatpe had to exit today over glaring corporate-governance issues in the fintech, his 9.5% stake, currently worth Rs 2,000 crore (US$240 million), would shrink to Rs 95,000. That is, if one considers the new “exit clauses” that VCs like 3one4 Capital, Yournest, and Blue Ashva Capital have proposed and even implemented in many popular new-age startups.
The era of hurried deal-making, driven by VCs’ fear of missing out, is over, and now VCs—both early-stage and large funds like Peak XV Partners (formerly Sequoia Capital India & SEA), Matrix Partners, and Accel—are using the cautious funding environment to enforce stricter terms.
They have traded that FOMO for spreadsheets; now it’s all about data points. There’s a heightened level of diligence and serious conversations around corporate governance, board and management constitution, cash management, transparency, and disclosures at all stages of fundraising, according to Rangam Sharma, counsel at Trilegal, an Indian law firm representing various foreign and Indian institutional investors.
Naturally, some founders are not having it.
In fact, one in every 10 deals fell through during term sheet negotiations in the year ended March 2024 due to founders and investors failing to agree on terms, The Ken has learnt. Just a year ago, this ratio was closer to 1:16.
And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Deals that used to close in one to three months are now extended for over six, Vishnu Nair, founder of Arambh Legal added. That’s because when speed often trumped diligence, it led to corporate-governance
Share this article with your network
Send the article link to friends or colleagues who might find this story interesting or insightful.
Send the article link to friends or colleagues who might find this story interesting or insightful.