|
|
The Collection Wed, 08 Oct 25 |
Multiple stories, multiple perspectives, one theme worth your time—every week. |
Good Morning [%first_name |Dear Reader%],
You are on a free plan. Your subscription has expired. Upgrade now to unlock premium newsletters, top feature stories, exclusive podcasts, and more.
Just about a week ago, company financials tracker Venture Intelligence released venture capital (VC) and private equity (PE) funding data for the first nine months of 2025. Late-stage startups bagged most of the pie, seeing 35% of the total deal value flowing into their war chests.
Now, that’s not surprising at all. Large, mature companies have usually grabbed the largest share of VC-PE funding during most years, primarily due to the fact that deals at that stage are generally big-ticket.
Overall VC-PE investment in India’s startups, though, has continued to trend quite a bit lower than the peaks it hit immediately after the Covid outbreak. The zero-interest rate policies (ZIRP) adopted by a few major central banks during and after the pandemic left the markets flush with funds for a couple of years, but that has been changing.
And the ones feeling this impact most acutely are early- and seed-stage startups.
Just look at how deal values and volumes have trended for different startup stages over the past few years.
“Safe bets” and close-to-IPO ventures are the flavour of the season.
To quote Arun Natarajan, founder of Venture Intelligence, from a Times of India piece about the data release: “Given the continued uncertainty on the global politico-economic front, investors can be expected to prefer late-stage minority investments, with a special focus on domestic market-oriented companies in the upcoming months as well.” In the same piece, Navin Honagudi, managing partner at Elev8 Venture Partners, says what we are witnessing right now is a “flight to quality, where capital is chasing fewer but stronger companies”.
The improved prospects for exits through IPOs is no doubt also fuelling the trend.
Given all this, I thought we’d use this week’s edition of The Collection to look at the evolution of VC funding and behaviour in India in the post-Covid, post-ZIRP era—from how the nature of VC-founder relationships have changed to shifts in term sheets and governance requirements.
It’s certainly cautious funding weather right now, and previously hot sectors such as quick commerce, fintech, and edtech have lost much of their sheen. If you can’t bet on sectors, though, you can definitely bet on founders.
Which is exactly what many VCs are doing now, looking for proven founders—with a solid record of delivering in the past—to invest in. Even if they have a chequered history.
Founders with a spotty track record? That’s no dealbreaker for VCs
From Bessemer to Blume, investors can’t help being drawn to entrepreneurs with a not-so-storied past
Another shift in the post-ZIRP era has been what VCs expect from term sheets and governance standards.
One in every 10 deals fell through during term sheet negotiations in the year ended March 2024 due to founders and investors failing to agree on terms, The Ken has learnt. Just a year ago, this ratio was closer to 1:16.
And that’s just the tip of the iceberg. Deals that used to close in one to three months are now extended for over six, Vishnu Nair, founder of Arambh Legal added. That’s because when speed often trumped diligence, it led to corporate-governance lapses in Bharatpe and Byju’s as well as in e-commerce marketplaces like Zilingo and Trell, auto-workshop aggregator Gomechanic, healthtech Mojocare, and automation platform Groyyo.
We explored these changes in detail in the story below.
Exit, but without big cheques: VCs warn India’s startup founders
To prioritise corporate governance and financial management, VCs like Peak XV, Matrix, and Accel are exercising a lot more oversight, introspection, and prudence while signing deals with Indian startup founders
VCs have also become more familiar with the idiosyncrasies of India’s funding environment, and with liquidity tightening, they’ve been forced to grow a bit of patience.
The Two by Two episode below features two founders-turned-VCs—Manav Garg, founder of Eka Software, co-founder of Together Fund, and Rajiv Srivatsa, co-founder of Urban Ladder, and founding partner at Antler India to explore what is and should be changing in venture-capital investing.
Two By Two • 17 |
|
There are, of course, some shifts VCs no doubt think they can do without. For instance, in 2022, India’s largest limited partner for venture capital, state-run Sidbi, suggested reducing management fees for VC funds larger than Rs 500 crore to 1.5% from 2%.
Management fees are how VCs keep their lights on. By tweaking it, Sidbi is taking aim at the salaries of fund managers and, in turn, their ability to attract good talent, said the VC partners.
“If any of our funds take a 1.5% fee from Sidbi, we will also want a similar structure,” said Rohan Paranjpey, managing partner of Waterfield Partners—an LP with a Rs 550 crore (US$66 million) corpus.
“A good number of LPs are uncomfortable with the 2% fee structure, and there is pushback on it,” said Shailesh Ghorpade, managing partner of Exfinity Partners, which has raised three funds from Sidbi.
In this story below, we explored the 2/20 rule that many VCs follow, whether the cut could backfire for Sidbi, and what is Sidbi’s larger role in India’s VC ecosystem.
Indian VCs’ boss wants them to take a pay cut
India's largest domestic investor Sidbi, has a US$1.2 billion corpus to invest in venture capital funds. Its push to lower VCs' fund management fees hits a nerve
Meanwhile, it isn’t just business that the flow of venture capital can impact—there are societal implications too.
How VCs killed the meaning of work
All across startups, there’s a silent epidemic—nobody knows why they’re doing what they do anymore. And it’s all the fault of VCs
VCs and techies are turning India into a nation of hired hands
The future of work is… whatever you don’t want to do
If this flow is directed at the right places and sectors, though, it can drive real positive change. We’ve written earlier about the shortage of funding for R&D in India, partly thanks to private investors’ lack of enthusiasm for it. But now, deeptech ventures make up over half of the portfolios of some generalist VC firms, according to Business Standard.
What’s it like investing in a sector where payoffs need far longer to gestate than most other segments? Ask the VC who invests solely in deeptech startups.
A VC’s non-guide to funding India’s deep-tech companies
Deep-tech funding has no playbook, says Speciale’s Vishesh Rajaram, who’s taken some of the boldest bets. This is also a reason why big VCs don’t play this game
That’s a wrap for today. I’ll see you next week with another interesting theme, but meanwhile, feel free to write to [email protected] if you have any thoughts, suggestions, or feedback.
Get a premium subscription to The Ken
Unrivaled analysis and powerful stories about businesses from award-winning journalists. Read by 5,00,000+ subscribers globally who want to be prepared for what comes next.
Trusted by 5,00,000+ executives & leaders from the world's most successful organisations & students at top post-graduate campuses









Do you know anyone else who would like to read this newsletter?
Share this edition with them.